JWST shows that dark matter doesn’t exist!

OK now that I got you attention with that over the top headline like newspapers print, lets talk about the facts. The cosmos has always been a wellspring of surprises, and our understanding of its early days remains incomplete. For decades, we were constrained by our technological limits—telescopes couldn’t peer far enough to capture light from the universe’s infancy. That changed with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which has pushed the boundaries of observational astronomy. However, the galaxies it reveals challenge our best theories, leading to unexpected puzzles, including the “overmassive” galaxies problem.

This issue underscores the gaps in our understanding of cosmic evolution and raises new hypotheses about the universe’s formative years. Among these, Milgromian Gravity (MOND) stands out as a compelling alternative to explain phenomena that defy conventional wisdom about dark matter.


The Overmassive Galaxies Problem

Earlier this year, JWST unveiled six distant galaxies much brighter—and therefore more massive—than expected for their age. The light from these galaxies suggests an abundance of stars that seemingly couldn’t have formed within the short span of the early universe, according to the ΛCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) model, our best cosmological framework.

Researchers quickly began questioning the assumptions underpinning these findings. The calculations rely on models that link galaxy light to stellar mass, but these models depend on assumptions about the initial mass function (IMF)—the distribution of star sizes within galaxies—and the efficiency of star formation. Alternative explanations suggest the light might originate not from stars but from active galactic nuclei (AGN) surrounding supermassive black holes, further complicating the analysis.

Compounding these uncertainties, simulations like TNG100 and TNG300, which represent the ΛCDM model, show that forming galaxies of such mass so early is highly unlikely. Yet, JWST data reveal a population of massive galaxies inconsistent with these predictions, hinting at possible revisions to our cosmological models.


MOND and the Early Universe

MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) offers a radically different explanation. Proposed in 1983 by Mordehai Milgrom, MOND modifies Newtonian dynamics in regimes of extremely low acceleration, circumventing the need for dark matter to explain galactic phenomena such as flat rotation curves. Instead, MOND posits that gravity behaves differently at low accelerations, an idea supported by various astrophysical observations.

Recent studies by McGaugh and collaborators argue that MOND not only predicts the existence of overmassive galaxies but also aligns with JWST’s findings. MOND’s framework suggests galaxies form faster and more efficiently, bypassing the hierarchical assembly model intrinsic to ΛCDM. Instead, galaxies might form monolithically, reaching massive sizes early on without relying on extensive mergers.

However, MOND has its limitations. It lacks a robust cosmological model like ΛCDM, making direct predictions for galaxy formation and evolution challenging. The plots presented by McGaugh and collaborators are based on simplified assumptions rather than detailed simulations, leaving room for interpretation.


Caveats and Implications

While MOND offers an intriguing perspective, several caveats temper its conclusions. The masses of JWST’s galaxies are likely overestimated due to uncertainties in modeling starlight and contributions from AGN. Additionally, the redshift measurements for many galaxies, critical for understanding their distance and age, rely on less precise imaging techniques rather than spectral analysis.

Furthermore, ΛCDM simulations, though currently inconsistent with JWST data, might evolve with improved computational power and larger sample sizes. A larger simulation volume, such as a hypothetical TNG600, could capture rarer, massive galaxies that better match observations.

Another critical limitation of MOND is its inability to account for certain large-scale phenomena, like the dynamics of galaxy clusters or the cosmic microwave background, without supplementary assumptions like sterile neutrinos. Despite these challenges, MOND’s predictions about early galaxy formation and its potential role in reionization provide a tantalizing avenue for future research.


The Road Ahead

JWST’s findings highlight gaps in both ΛCDM and MOND, signaling the need for continued exploration. As more data emerge, the debate between dark matter-based models and alternative theories like MOND will intensify, sharpening our understanding of the cosmos.

For now, JWST serves as a catalyst for scientific discovery, prompting new questions and inspiring innovative solutions. Whether the ultimate answer involves tweaking ΛCDM, embracing MOND, or developing an entirely new framework, the pursuit exemplifies the dynamic nature of science—constantly evolving, with each observation revealing another piece of the cosmic puzzle.

Leave a Reply